I’m having a few problems getting my flat stomach back after having a child (16 months ago now). It’s still stretched and flabby. Am i wasting my time hoping that excercise can tone it back to its flat pre-childbirth state (and will the skin always be this stretched?). Is my only hope surgery? As you age, there is a tendency for all people to get fatter in the lower stomach.
Look at all the 50-60 year old people around. They didn’t always look like that. Also, most women tend to retain a little fat after childbirth. Perhaps it is just because of the change in lifestyle that occurs. Exercising will reduce fat, but the exercise has to include low level cardio-vascular work performed for a reasonable length of time. Also, I think the effort you have to place in exercise has to increase, which is very difficult for young mothers who now have new responsibilities.
To really get back a flat stomach, I think it takes doing three cardio workouts a week and three weight training sessions a week. I also understand that for most young mothers that prescription isn’t entirely feasible. Unfortunately, that is what it takes. Surgery is a short term solution. After a few years, the same problem reoccurs because you have not dealt with the fundamental problem.
So what would happen if I woke up one morning and skipped breakfast(so I would have a small amount of carbs in my body) and went out for a real long walk of about say 10 miles? In such a case would both theory 2 & 3 kick into action and if so which would win out? The reason I ask, is that I want to know if starving yourself and exercising is an effective way of reducing body fat. I know that if a body is finding it difficult to locate an energy source it will also go for muscle tissue but won’t the exercise be helping against that and thus forcing fats to be targeted. I could very easily go for such a plan cause I hate eating for at least 3 hours after I wake up and even when I miss it, I don’t feel any hungrier during the rest of the day than when I do have a full breakfast.
Well, this is kind of missing the point of cardio exercise, which is that by exercising the heart muscle it becomes far more fit for everyday activity, using far fewer heartbeats overall through the day. The heartbeats used in short, intense exercise are made up in a hurry by those saved the rest of the time. If they are using their HRM to get their heart beat as rapidly as possible, then they are using the device for the wrong reason. Do you know people that do this, or are you just assuming this is how they train?
Anyone have any ideas as to the validity of the following: a girl I met at the gym a couple years ago told me that taking a sauna or steambath immediately after a workout was bad for you. She was a naturopath, and claimed that the sweat you produced in the sauna caused to lose too many minerals after all the ones you lost working out. When I remarked that the heat loosened me up, she replied that massage was a much better alternative. (Of course, she wasn’t offering!)
Some people will see a reduction following beginning an exercise program; others will not and some (granted few) will see an increase. (I will stick with total cholesterol for now). I recently saw a presentation from a prof at U of Maryland who is working with a geneticist. It seems that there are genes identified with cholesterol porduction (I will admit my ignorance in the area of genetics).



